|
 |
| The Chesterfield Canal - The Way
We Were |
|
|
May 10th 2007

Original scan
(full size)
Then and Now

Original scan
(full size)
Notes on Pride
by Christine Richardson
Pride was a typical working boat of the
Chesterfield Canal. The boat registers show that the year of construction
was 1903, probably at West Stockwith. The original owner was the
Steetley Lime Company, and the picture shows the boat alongside
the company’s quarry at Cinderhill. The first skipper was William
Hewitt, a member of a large family of working boatmen. On the maiden
voyage up the canal from West Stockwith the skipper stopped at Retford
on 31 July 1903 and had the new boat registered with the authorities
there as required by the Canal Boats Act of 1877 – it became number
44. The cargo was stated as "lime and limestone", and
the route Pride was to ply was between Woodend and Retford.
The aft cabin’s dimensions were - height 4ft, length 8ft 4ins, and
width 6ft 11ins. Pride was the only boat registered as owned
by the Steetley Company so the name may have been indicative of
the quarry owner’s pleasure in having his own transport system rather
than relying on other craft.
On December 1914 Pride was seen at Drakeholes
by a boat inspector, who made the note "a new boat", but
it is unclear what that signifies. However, a boat named Pride
was still in existence on 15 July 1920 when the ownership was changed
to Furley & Co of Gainsborough, and noted as still in existence
in July 1925.
The photograph was taken c1907 and the cumbersome
size and weight of cameras at that time probably indicates a formal
commission for the photographer who may have travelled from Worksop.
The children could have been the family of the quarry owner.
The existence of the photograph was known prior
to now, but only as a small illustration from Waterways World
magazine many years ago, and that had been cropped to remove the
right-hand side. That we now have the full image, and in a high
resolution, is due to the photograph’s owner Alan Mugleston of Devon
- who has generously supplied two large prints which will be of
tremendous value to the New Dawn Project.
Notes by Geraint Coles
The tramway is an edge railway. The
gauge is interesting – it appears to be quite wide (c. 2ft 6"
to 3ft" – compare with height of child) – rather too wide to
be a colliery dram line (mostly 18" to 2ft in these parts).
Wider gauges were common however in the railways serving limestone
quarries (no underground restrictions and bigger capacity I guess).
If the load is limestone (and it does appear to be big light coloured
blocks not black stuff) then this also fits with Cinderhill as there
was an adjacent quarry and the OS appears to show a small tramway
leading to a loading point on the canal.
There was a vogue in late Victorian/Edwardian
period for having pictures of your kids taken with your workhorse
– on the railways you see lots of Dad plus kids type family pictures
on locomotives. I have see similar on the canal (Christine
has a lovely one of a boat at Retford with everyone in their Sunday
Best). Normally dad is in the picture (is that him on the
wall?). Equally the kids could be window dressing "borrowed"
by the photographer to make a nice sentimental scene. In
the distance near he bridge is another figure bending down near
a huddle of stuff – this might be the photographer’s assistant with
bicycle and the portable darkroom needed to set up the glass photographic
plates.
Notes by John Lower
The second picture was taken on March 6th
in as near as possible to the location of the original photograph.
I was in fact standing next to the top gate of the new Boundary
Lock 41a, which was constructed as part of the present restoration.
It is noticeable that the right-hand aqueduct parapet slopes down
in front of the standing person on the original photo – the repair
is clearly visible at the present time. In the original photo, the
left-hand parapet is of stone, but it is now blue brick. A stone
in the present wall reads "constructed 1772-77, reconstructed
1946", ie after the earlier photo was taken. Christine Richardson
notes that the aqueduct was originally built circa 1773.
=============
We have been sent this postcard of the Chesterfield
Canal taken sometime in the past!
I wonder if anyone can help with details about the
location, date, maybe even who the children were, and the tramway
alongside the boat? Any help in locating this scene would be very
welcome.
Please send any ideas
. March 16th 2007
|
|
The way we were ... twenty years ago
The second 'Walk to Rhodeesia' campaign walk was held
New information panels were unveiled at Town Lock Retford
and Turnerwood, hand-painted by Brian Pearson
A boat rally was held at Sandhill Lake Worksop in May
in incessant rain
Chesterfield Canal day was held a Lavers in Chesterfield
in September
The Norwood Packet was relaunched on the summit pound
after a year's layoff
Researches unearthed 'The History of Chesterfield' published
in 1939 and published by Fod, Stationer, Irongate, with many interesting
references to the Chesterfield Canal
Concern was raised about the effect of the proposed Staveley
- Brimington bypass on the canal in Derbyshire, which was to block
the canal
While the CCS estimate for restoring the canal from Worksop
to Rhodesia was £66k, British Waterways' calculation was £470,850!
Membership reached 204 and membership remained at £2pa
The way we were...June 1777
As canal navigations have been found highly beneficial to the
public, especially those concerned in trade, it is with very great
pleasure we inform our readers that the canal from Chesterfield
to Stockwith is now navigable from one end to the other; and we
hear from Chesterfield that a boat laden with goods from Stockwith,
was brought to that town on Wednesday last (being the King's birthday).
When the canal was opened; - an account so long wished for, so interesting
and advantageous could not be regarded as a common occurrence, and
therefore was celebrated by the proprietors in the town, and the
inhabitants in general, with all those demonstrations of satisfaction
and joy, which they must feel on such an occasion.
The boat was met a t the first lock, by several gentle men
of the committee and a great number of proprietors, attended by
a very larg concourse of people, and was introduced, with colours
flying, firing of guns, and a band of music, after which the goods
were unloaded and put into waggons, which were drawn to the town
by the navigators, preceded by the gentlemen of the committee and
proprietors, who awlked in procession with the music playing before
them.
The assiduity of the workmen, whose labour for the last three
weeks almost exceeds belief, was rewarded by a handsome treat given
them by the proprietors, of which nearly 300 of them partook, and
the gentlemen of the town concluded the day with a cheerful glass;
ringing of bells, bonfires, and fireworks contrubuting to the festivity
of the evening.
We cannot help mentioning one circumstace to the honour of
the poor working navigators, who tho' generally stiled the sons
of riot and confusion, behaved in the mos decent and orderly manner,
and dispersed early in the evening, without making any disturbance
whatever.
The next day, the gentlemen gave the ladies a treat on the
water, and the boat which was honoured wih bringing the first load
of goods to Chesterfield, received the additional and much greater
honour of conveying above 100 ladies of that town through the first
lock, the boat was lined and decorated with streamers, and furnished
with an excellent band of music provided for the occasion.
It is now generally believed that this navigation cannot fail
of paying the proprietors very large interest for their money, as
the weekly tonnage already rceived (even in its unfinished state)
has been very considerable, and we are informed that great quantities
of goods of vaious kinds, are daily conveyed thereby which were
not considered or thought of at commencement of the undertaking.
From the Derby Mercury June 9th 1777
|
| The Chesterfield Canal - The
Way We Were |
|
|
Tonnage on the Chesterfield Canal. Source unknown
|
|
Year
|
Coal
|
Lead
|
Lime
|
Corn
|
Stone
|
Iron
|
Timber
|
Sundries
|
Total
|
|
1777
|
12,058
|
3,429
|
4,677
|
1,671
|
2,133
|
519
|
2,575
|
5,560
|
32,622
|
|
1780
|
17,065
|
1,852
|
4,093
|
2,227
|
2,667
|
1,732
|
1,377
|
4,723
|
35,738
|
|
1790
|
13,924
|
3,204
|
4,326
|
7,545
|
6,845
|
1,383
|
2,422
|
13,992
|
85,641
|
|
1800
|
52,325
|
1,367
|
3,867
|
8,426
|
10,929
|
2,622
|
4,376
|
11,966
|
95,878
|
|
1810
|
52,886
|
1,054
|
4,287
|
12,158
|
12,595
|
5,965
|
4,054
|
18,924
|
111,903
|
|
1820
|
43,494
|
58
|
4,654
|
11,764
|
12,094
|
3,296
|
2,621
|
18,352
|
96,333
|
|
1826
|
38,154
|
105
|
3,549
|
18,107
|
14,174
|
4,296
|
4,256
|
20,397
|
103,020
|
|
The way we were ... twenty years ago
The second 'Walk to Rhodeesia' campaign walk was held
New information panels were unveiled at Town Lock Retford
and Turnerwood, hand-painted by Brian Pearson
A boat rally was held at Sandhill Lake Worksop in May
in incessant rain
Chesterfield Canal day was held a Lavers in Chesterfield
in September
The Norwood Packet was relaunched on the summit pound
after a year's layoff
Researches unearthed 'The History of Chesterfield'
published in 1939 and published by Fod, Stationer, Irongate, with
many interesting references to the Chesterfield Canal
Concern was raised about the effect of the proposed
Staveley - Brimington bypass on the canal in Derbyshire, which
was to block the canal
While the CCS estimate for restoring the canal from
Worksop to Rhodesia was £66k, British Waterways' calculation was
£470,850!
Membership reached 204 and membership remained at £2pa
The way we were...June 1777
As canal navigations have been found highly beneficial to
the public, especially those concerned in trade, it is with very
great pleasure we inform our readers that the canal from Chesterfield
to Stockwith is now navigable from one end to the other; and we
hear from Chesterfield that a boat laden with goods from Stockwith,
was brought to that town on Wednesday last (being the King's birthday).
When the canal was opened; - an account so long wished for, so
interesting and advantageous could not be regarded as a common
occurrence, and therefore was celebrated by the proprietors in
the town, and the inhabitants in general, with all those demonstrations
of satisfaction and joy, which they must feel on such an occasion.
The boat was met a t the first lock, by several gentle men
of the committee and a great number of proprietors, attended by
a very larg concourse of people, and was introduced, with colours
flying, firing of guns, and a band of music, after which the goods
were unloaded and put into waggons, which were drawn to the town
by the navigators, preceded by the gentlemen of the committee
and proprietors, who awlked in procession with the music playing
before them.
The assiduity of the workmen, whose labour for the last three
weeks almost exceeds belief, was rewarded by a handsome treat
given them by the proprietors, of which nearly 300 of them partook,
and the gentlemen of the town concluded the day with a cheerful
glass; ringing of bells, bonfires, and fireworks contrubuting
to the festivity of the evening.
We cannot help mentioning one circumstace to the honour of
the poor working navigators, who tho' generally stiled the sons
of riot and confusion, behaved in the mos decent and orderly manner,
and dispersed early in the evening, without making any disturbance
whatever.
The next day, the gentlemen gave the ladies a treat on the
water, and the boat which was honoured wih bringing the first
load of goods to Chesterfield, received the additional and much
greater honour of conveying above 100 ladies of that town through
the first lock, the boat was lined and decorated with streamers,
and furnished with an excellent band of music provided for the
occasion.
It is now generally believed that this navigation cannot
fail of paying the proprietors very large interest for their money,
as the weekly tonnage already rceived (even in its unfinished
state) has been very considerable, and we are informed that great
quantities of goods of vaious kinds, are daily conveyed thereby
which were not considered or thought of at commencement of the
undertaking.
From the Derby Mercury June 9th 1777
|
|
 |
|